 |
 |
|
| VISION |
| Becoming “the leading” Polypropylene Composite Material and Alloys manufacturing company in India. |
| |
|
| |
| MISSION |
 |
To be the most successful Polypropylene Composite Materials and Alloys Company in India by measurable enhancing our customers’ performance through fulfilling their needs and responsibly applying our assets, people, technology and expertise. |
|
Our performance has to be recognized by our customers as being the leader for technology, quality, cost performance and service. We aim to maintain a long-term leading position in India’s Automotive Market and other selected market segments. |
|
| |
|
| |
| Corporate Information |
| Chairman |
Mr. M. D. Jindal |
| Shareholders |
Machino Polymers Limited is part of the Machino Group of Companies and is 100% owned by Jindals. |
| Production Capacity |
Current 50.0 KT per annum
|
| Technical Development Centre
|
Pilot Production Machine
Mechanical, Physical and Chemical Testing Facilities.
|
| Date of Establishment |
Mr. M. D. Jindal
made an agreement with Himont in 1994 and installed R&D facility in
1995 with an idea of being the captive supplier to Maruti. |
| Commencement of Business |
November, 1996 - Started commercial production in technical collaboration with Himont Inc., formerly Machino Polymer Limited
February 06,1999 - 50:50 Joint Venture was formed between
Basell (formerly Montell through its investment arm Basell International
Holdings B.V.) & Machino Plastics Limited.
Name changed to Machino-Montell India Limited in July 1999.
Name changed to Machino-Basell India Limited in Jan 2001.
January, 2007- Name changed back to Machino Polymers Ltd. |
| Head Office & Registered Office
|
Plot No - 2, Sector - 33 Delhi-Jaipur Highway Gurgaon 122001, India
T : +91-124-4684200
F : +91-124-4684299
E : administrator@machinopolymers.com
W : www.machinopolymers.com |
| Paid-up Capital |
$ 3 Million |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
Approach of MPL |
|
 |
Work closely with OEMs and Tier1’s |
|
|
Dedicated development by R&D and Q&A |
|
|
To be present locally to support OEMs |
|
|
Win application via competitive price |
|
|
With running business, competitive pricing |
| |
|
|
|
